See the need
Condition, remaining life, work history, and cost sit on the same asset.
AI-native capital plans from the same CMMS history. A person still funds.
TwinEdge Capital Planning uses the same history, work, and condition as the CMMS to draft keep, repair, or replace plans. You compare budgets. A person still funds the program.

How many assets are in poor condition, how many hit end of life in five years, and what that costs.
Condition, remaining life, work history, and cost sit on the same asset.
Compare replacement years, grants, and what you can defer.
A person accepts. Projects and the audit trail stay on that record.
The first plan comes from live equipment history.
See cost, risk, and deferred work before you commit.
Why this year, why this asset, and who approved it.
Select a screen to explore the workflow. Open it for a closer look.
How many assets are in poor condition, how many hit end of life soon, and what that costs.
Condition, remaining life, work history, and cost become a first-pass plan.
Projects, funding sources, construction, a strategic asset management plan (SAMP), executive reports, and an audit trail.
TwinEdge already has the work, the condition, and the cost. Capital Planning turns that into a keep, repair, or replace draft so finance is not starting from a blank sheet.
The value is drafting the spend from the same history operations already trust.
Keep source context available as the workflow moves between teams and applications.
TwinEdge Capital Planning
No. It drafts replacement years and compares budgets. A person accepts the scenario and funds the program. Plans stay draft, computed, or approved.
The same CMMS record operations already use: condition, remaining life, work history, cost, and risk. You do not start from a blank spreadsheet.
A strategic asset management plan — the document that tells a board or a regulator why you will spend on these assets, in this order, over these years. TwinEdge drafts it from the same record as the replacement plan.
Yes. The Capital Advisor compares total cost of options such as keep, repair, and replace, with confidence and data gaps. A person still picks.
Discuss your sources, assets, and the outcomes your team wants to improve.